![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
What's Going On in the Missouri Synod? Additional citations from the Bible and the Lutheran Confessions not included in the study materials are linked to this document and will open in a separate window. The Service of Women (Order of Creation)
Up until 1969, the Missouri Synod, along with other members of the Synodical Conference, taught and practiced that on the basis of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 and 1 Timothy 2:11-12, a woman was not to have authority over a man by either participation in congregational meetings, nor by holding a congregational office. “All adult male members of the congregation have the right to participate actively in the discussions, votes, and decisions of the congregation since that is a right of the whole congregation. See Matt. 18:17-18; Acts 1:15, 23-26; 15:5, 12-13, 22-23; 1 Cor 5:2; 6:2; 10:15; 12:7; 2 Cor 2:6-8; 2 Thess. 3:15. Excluded from the exercise of this right are the youth (1 Pet 5:5) and the female members of the congregation (1 Cor 14:34-35)” (Walther’s “Pastoral Theology,” 1995, translated from 1906 version) In 1969, the Missouri Synod in Convention, granted women the right to vote in congregational meetings and to hold congregational offices which do not involve a violation of the order of creation. Furthermore, any office whose function was to assist the Pastor in his office was strictly forbidden to women. “Does such an exercise of the franchise constitute an act of domination over someone else, especially over one’s husband? Suffrage is defined by The Oxford English Dictionary as “a vote given by a member of a body, state, or society…”; also “the right or privilege of voting as a member of a body, state, etc.”… From this definition of suffrage public teaching in the church is not an essential or necessary part of suffrage in the church… It is also evident from the definition of the franchise that it does not give to those who have the right of suffrage the power to lord it over others… In the matter of suffrage, then, we conclude that there is nothing in Scripture to prohibit women from exercising the franchise in the voters’ meeting of the congregations to which they belong. When it comes to the matter of holding office in the church…. …the basic question remains: Does such office-holding, of itself, constitute an act of lording it over others?” …After all, the church is the people of God, among whom the structures of organization, exist as a means of ministering to others (cf. Eph 4:12, Luke 22:25). In this understanding of the church, the exercise of the franchise offers the privilege of service to the body of Christ rather than the prerogative of power over a political entity” (1969 CTCR Report “Woman Suffrage in the Church”). In 1985, the CTCR report “Women in the Church,” began to collapse the Scriptural prohibition, “that a woman is not to have authority over a man,” so that it only applied to the exercise of the Pastoral Office. In 1994, the CTCR report “The Service of Women in Congregational and Synodical Offices” concluded that women may serve “in all offices of the congregation, including that of chairman, vice-chairman and elder, and district and Synodical boards and commissions” provided that they don’t involve the public accountability for the function[ing] of the pastoral office.” A CTCR Minority Report of five LCMS professors disagreed. The most glaring problems with the report: “first, the treatment of terms such as ‘teaching,’ ‘exercising authority,’ etc., and second the understanding of the doctrine of the order of creation…. Simple equation of teaching with the pastoral office seems too facile for this text…. The issues surrounding the verb authenteoo (“to exercise/usurp authority”) are very difficult and simply must be handled, as the Report does not…. This is especially true in the case at hand, when the current Report puts forth positions which are at odds with the official position adopted by the Synod. Our fundamental concern, however, is that in an important matter such as this we study seriously and reverently the Word of God as his faithful people” (CTCR Minority Report, 1985). The 1995 LCMS Convention did not accept the 1994 report, but told the CTCR to continue to study the issues in consultation with the faculties of the seminaries and to “address concerns regarding the priesthood of all believers, the order of creation, and the Greek word authentein.” Without another study being produced, the 2004 Synodical Convention approved Resolution 3-08A, “To Affirm the Conclusions of the 1994 CTCR Report: The Service of Women in Congregational and Synodical Offices.” Based on an incomplete and flawed report, the LC-MS Convention approved women to serve in every humanly established office. The issue of authority (point 7A above) was not considered. Here’s what part of the resolution says: …WHEREAS, This 1994 report also stated that "these considerations imply and even require, that in determining the eligibility of women for services in all congregational, District, and synodical offices, attention be given to the functions attached to a given office. As the Commission stated in the 1985 report on Women in the Church, 'For other offices [other than the office of public ministry of Word and sacraments] we have no express "thus saith the Lord" and everything depends on the functions assigned to these offices'"; and…. Therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod affirm that women on the basis of the clear teaching of Scripture may not serve in the office of pastor nor exercise any of its distinctive functions, and that women may serve in humanly established offices in the church as long as the functions of these offices do not make them eligible to carry out "official functions [that] would involve public accountability for the function of the pastoral office";… It’s not a good sign when the Synod doesn’t understand what it has passed. Soon after the Convention, Synodical President Gerald Kieschnick appointed a task force to provide guidelines for implementing Res. 3-08A. He acknowledged: “For the sake of maintaining the unity of doctrine and practice in all the districts of the Synod, it is imperative that the congregations of our Synod understand clearly what this resolution says and does not say, what it allows and does not allow, in order to prevent widely varying interpretations of such phrases as ‘the distinctive functions of the pastoral office’ and ‘public accountability for the pastoral office.’” The foregoing material developed by and used with permission of Trinity Lutheran Church, Herrin, Illinois.
|
||||
|
|
©2001-2008 Grace Lutheran Church. All Rights Reserved. |
||||